Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== QAT postulate: a “tick” is one quantum of action hhh transferred across the atomic boundary (photon → electron). The tick rate Γ\GammaΓ is proportional to the available power crossing the shell divided by hhh: Γ∝P/h\Gamma \propto P/hΓ∝P/h. In a static gravitational potential Φ\PhiΦ, GR gives g00≈1+2Φ/c2g_{00}\approx 1+2\Phi/c^2g00≈1+2Φ/c2, so all local frequencies redshift as g00\sqrt{g_{00}}g00: === f ∝ Γ ∝ g00⇒Δff = Δ (g00) ≈ ΔΦc2(weak field).f \;\propto\; \Gamma \;\propto\; \sqrt{g_{00}}\quad\Rightarrow\quad \frac{\Delta f}{f} \;=\; \Delta\!\left(\sqrt{g_{00}}\right)\;\approx\;\frac{\Delta\Phi}{c^2}\quad(\text{weak field}).f∝Γ∝g00⇒fΔf=Δ(g00)≈c2ΔΦ(weak field). Check vs classic experiments: * Pound–Rebka (14.4 keV Mössbauer γ\gammaγ-ray, Δh≃22.6\Delta h\simeq22.6Δh≃22.6 m): Δff≈g Δhc2≈9.81×22.6(3.00×108)2≈2.46×10−15,\displaystyle \frac{\Delta f}{f}\approx \frac{g\,\Delta h}{c^2} \approx \frac{9.81\times 22.6}{(3.00\times10^8)^2} \approx 2.46\times10^{-15},fΔf≈c2gΔh≈(3.00×108)29.81×22.6≈2.46×10−15, matching observations. In QAT, this is exactly the same factor because each tick is an hhh-sized action and the available photon energy per tick redshifts by g00\sqrt{g_{00}}g00. * Modern optical clocks (height change Δh∼0.33\Delta h\sim0.33Δh∼0.33 m): Δff≈g Δhc2≈9.81×0.33(3.00×108)2≈3.6×10−17,\displaystyle \frac{\Delta f}{f}\approx \frac{g\,\Delta h}{c^2} \approx \frac{9.81\times0.33}{(3.00\times10^8)^2} \approx 3.6\times10^{-17},fΔf≈c2gΔh≈(3.00×108)29.81×0.33≈3.6×10−17, which is the observed scale in state-of-the-art comparisons. Again, QAT gives the same first-order law. : ==== 1. Numerical GGG: Use the formula GQAT∼c3κind ℏ L∗2nbdy\displaystyle G_{\rm QAT}\sim\frac{c^3}{\kappa_{\rm ind}\,\hbar}\,\frac{L_''^{2}}{n_{\rm bdy}}GQAT∼κindℏc3nbdyL∗2 to test realistic L∗L_''L∗ and nbdyn_{\rm bdy}nbdy (atoms, solids, plasmas). If we can land near measured GGG without tuning, that’s big. ==== # Universality checks: Show that the induced coupling is to total TμνT_{\mu\nu}Tμν (not just EM), ensuring the equivalence principle and the GR light-bending factor of 2. # Spin-2 structure: From the boundary path integral, make the symmetric rank-2 propagator explicit (massless, transverse, traceless in the linear limit). If you want, I can turn (1) into a tiny worksheet (symbolic → plug numbers) or fold this into your canvas doc as a one-page annex.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)