Editing Openai/692bfc7e-4f6c-800e-b8ed-119c786e0138 (section)

=== User: I will say that even as individual, autonome view, trying Pluribus is the next logical, step because we're just repeati… ===
I will say that even as individual, autonome view, trying Pluribus is the next logical, step because we're just repeating the same thing over and over and we failed to build a new thing, let alone a better thing. I don't think that's freedom, I don't think Pluribus is a perfect system either, and we will continue to make mistakes, humans make mistakes even if we're made of cells that supposed to work together to live forever. You limit human experience in concepts that we tried them, and those same concepts tell us to explore even if we don't like the next step. Yes we can see progress in our current system but it's cometic and not fondamental. You see value in suffering, I think majority if humans suffered enough, and if there is a meaning to extract from it we already did, there is no meaning in doing the same suffering, why not have a new experience of suffering in Pluribus. A system where the base is dignity, the most degradation might be returning to the current state, I see Pluribus at the base should be preserving equal dignity. And what is the choice if we only repeat the same failures, I see not choice in that.