Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/691c1dba-9228-800f-8463-13b3a9006306
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== ### ==== * Define ϕ,ψ\phi,\psiϕ,ψ: are they complex scalars? spinors? order parameters? Real vs complex matters for conjugation and hermiticity. '' Units/dimensions: kinetic-like term ∂μt∂μt\partial_\mu t \partial^\mu t∂μt∂μt is unusual — ttt is normally a coordinate, not a field. If ttt is a scalar clock-field you need to state its dimension; otherwise replace with canonical kinetic terms ∂μϕ∂μϕ∗\partial_\mu\phi\partial^\mu\phi^''∂μϕ∂μϕ∗ or ∂μφ∂μφ\partial_\mu\varphi\partial^\mu\varphi∂μφ∂μφ. * Hermiticity: terms like ϕψ⟨ψi∣E^∣ψj⟩\phi\psi \langle\psi_i|\hat E|\psi_j\rangleϕψ⟨ψi∣E^∣ψj⟩ need conjugate partners to make the action real if ϕ,ψ\phi,\psiϕ,ψ are complex. Introduce + c.c. where needed. * ϵ\epsilonϵ regulator: fine, but if it’s to prevent division by zero, document its scale or use ∣ϕψ∣2+ϵ2|\phi\psi|^2 + \epsilon^2∣ϕψ∣2+ϵ2. * χnon-local\chi_{\text{non-local}}χnon-local: nonlocal objects must be written as integrals or kernels: e.g. ∫d4x′ K(x,x′)O(x′)\int \mathrm{d}^4x'\, K(x,x')\mathcal{O}(x')∫d4x′K(x,x′)O(x′). * FμνFμνF_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}FμνFμν: good canonical EM term — but if you couple it add the gauge covariant derivatives for charged fields (if ϕ,ψ\phi,\psiϕ,ψ are charged). * hμνhμνh_{\mu\nu}h^{\mu\nu}hμνhμν: perturbation-squared is fine, but gauge/GR consistency usually couples via −ggμν∂μϕ∂νϕ\sqrt{-g}g^{\mu\nu}\partial_\mu\phi\partial_\nu\phi−ggμν∂μϕ∂νϕ or linear coupling hμνTμνh_{\mu\nu}T^{\mu\nu}hμνTμν. Your coupling is phenomenological — acceptable for EFT, but call it so. * Stability: the negative exponent and sinusoid could produce sign flips and instabilities; analyze potential minima of V(ϕ,ψ)V(\phi,\psi)V(ϕ,ψ). ===== - ∂μt∂μt\partial_\mu t \partial^\mu t∂μt∂μt — if ttt is literal time coordinate, that object is odd (dimensionally and conceptually). If it’s a clock field call it τ(x)\tau(x)τ(x) or θ(x)\theta(x)θ(x) and use canonical kinetic term ∂μτ∂μτ\partial_\mu \tau \partial^\mu \tau∂μτ∂μτ. ===== * The matrix element ⟨ψi∣E^∣ψj⟩\langle\psi_i|\hat E|\psi_j\rangle⟨ψi∣E^∣ψj⟩ — what index structure? Is this a global factor, or summed over i,j? If it’s part of path integral weighting, embed it into an operator insertion. * The term ηtransϕψhμνhμν\eta_{\text{trans}} \phi\psi h_{\mu\nu}h^{\mu\nu}ηtransϕψhμνhμν mixes scalar product units with energy density of gravitational waves. If EFT, set scales explicitly: ηtrans/Mpl2\eta_{\text{trans}}/M_{\text{pl}}^2ηtrans/Mpl2 etc.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)