Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6954e710-0754-8011-8a4e-34638e41ac55
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Hey David — here’s the full list of sources I used, grouped by platform. === Hey David — here’s the full list of sources I used, grouped by platform. Each item links to the original via the citation. ==== Official OpenAI announcements / docs ==== * Introducing GPT‑5.2 (model lineup and claims). OpenAI<ref>{{cite web|title=OpenAI|url=https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5-2/|publisher=openai.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * Strengthening ChatGPT responses in sensitive conversations (safety updates relevant to 5.x behavior). OpenAI<ref>{{cite web|title=OpenAI|url=https://openai.com/index/strengthening-chatgpt-responses-in-sensitive-conversations/|publisher=openai.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * OpenAI on X: rollout and Codex availability posts. X (formerly Twitter)<ref>{{cite web|title=X (formerly Twitter)|url=https://x.com/OpenAI|publisher=X (formerly Twitter)|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> ==== OpenAI Community (forums) ==== * “GPT‑5.2 is rolling out right now!” (announcement thread + user reactions). OpenAI Developer Community<ref>{{cite web|title=OpenAI Developer Community|url=https://community.openai.com/t/gpt-5-2-is-rolling-out-right-now/1369052|publisher=OpenAI Developer Community|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * “Possible routing bug in GPT‑5.2 Pro?” (mode‑routing / consistency). OpenAI Developer Community<ref>{{cite web|title=OpenAI Developer Community|url=https://community.openai.com/t/possible-routing-bug-in-gpt-5-2-pro/1369079|publisher=OpenAI Developer Community|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * “Model selection not being honored” (5.2 responding like Instant). OpenAI Developer Community<ref>{{cite web|title=OpenAI Developer Community|url=https://community.openai.com/t/model-selection-not-being-honored/1369155|publisher=OpenAI Developer Community|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * “GPT‑5 & 5.1 (and 5.2) Codex quality degrading…” (coders reporting regressions). OpenAI Developer Community<ref>{{cite web|title=OpenAI Developer Community|url=https://community.openai.com/t/gpt-5-5-1-and-5-2-codex-quality-degrading-over-last-month-or-so/1366694|publisher=OpenAI Developer Community|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * “Codex‑5.2 restored system‑level deletion… no hype” (positive Codex report). OpenAI Developer Community<ref>{{cite web|title=OpenAI Developer Community|url=https://community.openai.com/t/codex-5-2-restored-system-level-deletion-and-it-is-quite-remarkable-no-hype/1369174|publisher=OpenAI Developer Community|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * “Learning resources for Codex” (praise for 5.2‑Codex from users). OpenAI Developer Community<ref>{{cite web|title=OpenAI Developer Community|url=https://community.openai.com/t/learning-resources-for-codex/1370475|publisher=OpenAI Developer Community|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * “5.1 model inaccessible when using Custom Actions” (impact of 5.x changes). OpenAI Developer Community<ref>{{cite web|title=OpenAI Developer Community|url=https://community.openai.com/t/custom-gpt-issue-5-1-model-inaccessible-when-using-custom-actions/1369361|publisher=OpenAI Developer Community|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> ==== Reddit ==== * “Surprised at all the negative feedback about GPT‑5.2” (contrarian, positive). Reddit<ref>{{cite web|title=Reddit|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1pmjvl1/surprised_at_all_the_negative_feedback_about_gpt52/|publisher=reddit.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * “OpenAI 5.2 feels like a downgrade. Anyone else?” (degradation reports). Reddit<ref>{{cite web|title=Reddit|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1psm311/openai_52_feels_like_a_downgrade_anyone_else/|publisher=reddit.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * “GPT‑5.2 is another … disaster rn” (early backlash thread). Reddit<ref>{{cite web|title=Reddit|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1pl9sjf/gpt_52_is_another_fucking_disaster_rn_i_am/|publisher=reddit.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * “Introducing GPT‑5.2” (release discussion). Reddit<ref>{{cite web|title=Reddit|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1pk4x35/introducing_gpt52/|publisher=reddit.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * “GPT‑5.2 actually feels different — what are you seeing?” (behavior change). Reddit<ref>{{cite web|title=Reddit|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1pkpioi/gpt52_actually_feels_different_what_are_you_seeing/|publisher=reddit.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * “Review: My experiences with GPT‑5.2 so far” (longer-form user review). Reddit<ref>{{cite web|title=Reddit|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/MyBoyfriendIsAI/comments/1puly8t/review_my_experiences_with_gpt52_so_far/|publisher=reddit.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> ==== Hacker News ==== * “GPT‑5.2” (mixed test results; Instant vs high‑reasoning notes). Hacker News<ref>{{cite web|title=Hacker News|url=https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46234788|publisher=Hacker News|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * “Is Adaptive Reasoning gone from GPT‑5.2?” (OpenAI reply: still present). Hacker News<ref>{{cite web|title=Hacker News|url=https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46235267|publisher=Hacker News|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * “Why GPT‑5.2 is our model of choice for Augment Code” (pro‑5.2 coding feedback + astroturf concerns in comments). Hacker News<ref>{{cite web|title=Hacker News|url=https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46235148|publisher=Hacker News|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * “GPT‑5.2‑Codex” (coder experiences). Hacker News<ref>{{cite web|title=Hacker News|url=https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46316367|publisher=Hacker News|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> ==== X / Twitter (selection across sentiments) ==== * Sam Altman: “GPT‑5.2 Pro is a step change” (math research use). X (formerly Twitter)<ref>{{cite web|title=X (formerly Twitter)|url=https://x.com/sama|publisher=X (formerly Twitter)|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * General sentiment: “5.2 a downgrade vs 5.1/4o” (rankings image threads). X (formerly Twitter)<ref>{{cite web|title=X (formerly Twitter)|url=https://x.com/ai_handle/status/2002024375856537617|publisher=X (formerly Twitter)|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * Medical VQA critique (hard visual reasoning). X (formerly Twitter)<ref>{{cite web|title=X (formerly Twitter)|url=https://x.com/DrDatta_AIIMS/status/1999464987203682741|publisher=X (formerly Twitter)|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * Power users praising Pro / complaining about speed. X (formerly Twitter)<ref>{{cite web|title=X (formerly Twitter)|url=https://x.com/altryne/status/1999235391841534009|publisher=X (formerly Twitter)|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * User complaints: “5.2 is terrible/downgrade” (various). X (formerly Twitter)<ref>{{cite web|title=X (formerly Twitter)|url=https://x.com/Ty_Hope/status/1999768839580692615|publisher=X (formerly Twitter)|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * Developer takes on Codex & long‑horizon tasks (positive). X (formerly Twitter)<ref>{{cite web|title=X (formerly Twitter)|url=https://x.com/VictorTaelin/status/2001825204671004766|publisher=X (formerly Twitter)|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * Community questions about 5.2‑Codex before upgrading. X (formerly Twitter)<ref>{{cite web|title=X (formerly Twitter)|url=https://x.com/cryptotriv/status/2001900072871833687|publisher=X (formerly Twitter)|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * Release/feature roundups. X (formerly Twitter)<ref>{{cite web|title=X (formerly Twitter)|url=https://x.com/CohorteAI/status/1999536266522525701|publisher=X (formerly Twitter)|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * Comparative UX comments (Gemini/Grok/Opus vs 5.2). X (formerly Twitter)<ref>{{cite web|title=X (formerly Twitter)|url=https://x.com/jasondeanlee/status/2000281784257536370|publisher=X (formerly Twitter)|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * Specific error examples (history/knowledge misses). X (formerly Twitter)<ref>{{cite web|title=X (formerly Twitter)|url=https://x.com/Blue_Beba_/status/2000164648570474693|publisher=X (formerly Twitter)|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * Account aggregating “keep 4o” reactions. X (formerly Twitter)<ref>{{cite web|title=X (formerly Twitter)|url=https://x.com/keepgpt4o|publisher=X (formerly Twitter)|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> ==== GitHub issues / discussions (developer tooling & SDKs) ==== * VS Code + ChatGPT agent issues with 5.2 (stops early / loses context / incomplete). GitHub<ref>{{cite web|title=GitHub|url=https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/issues/283145|publisher=github.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * VS Code Insider: 5.2 restarts tasks mid‑flow (context loss). GitHub<ref>{{cite web|title=GitHub|url=https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/issues/285204|publisher=github.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * openai/codex — tool preamble / turn‑ending behavior in 5.2. GitHub<ref>{{cite web|title=GitHub|url=https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/7900|publisher=github.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * openai/codex — “does not follow simple instructions / random exploring”. GitHub<ref>{{cite web|title=GitHub|url=https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/8208|publisher=github.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * openai/codex — hard 10KB tool‑output truncation in 5.2 harness. GitHub<ref>{{cite web|title=GitHub|url=https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/7906|publisher=github.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * openai/codex — “Thank you for GPT‑5.2!” (positive code quality). GitHub<ref>{{cite web|title=GitHub|url=https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/7946|publisher=github.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * openai/openai‑apps‑sdk‑examples — method calling reliability w/ 5.2. GitHub<ref>{{cite web|title=GitHub|url=https://github.com/openai/openai-apps-sdk-examples/issues/160|publisher=github.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * LibreChat (Azure‑hosted gpt‑5.2) discussion. GitHub<ref>{{cite web|title=GitHub|url=https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/discussions/10971|publisher=github.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * lencx/ChatGPT app — 5.2 upgrade not responding. GitHub<ref>{{cite web|title=GitHub|url=https://github.com/lencx/ChatGPT/issues/1630|publisher=github.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * sst/opencode — 5.2 context length handling report. GitHub<ref>{{cite web|title=GitHub|url=https://github.com/sst/opencode/issues/6071|publisher=github.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * simonw/llm — model IDs (gpt‑5.2, chat‑latest, pro). GitHub<ref>{{cite web|title=GitHub|url=https://github.com/simonw/llm/issues/1317|publisher=github.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * HeyPuter — “gpt‑5.2‑pro model does not work.” GitHub<ref>{{cite web|title=GitHub|url=https://github.com/HeyPuter/puter/issues/2205|publisher=github.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> ==== Press, blogs, long‑form analyses ==== * Reuters: OpenAI launches GPT‑5.2 (release & positioning). Reuters<ref>{{cite web|title=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/technology/openai-launches-gpt-52-ai-model-with-improved-capabilities-2025-12-11/|publisher=reuters.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * Wired: OpenAI rolls back model router; 5.2 Instant default for most users (UX/speed context). WIRED<ref>{{cite web|title=WIRED|url=https://www.wired.com/story/openai-router-relaunch-gpt-5-sam-altman|publisher=wired.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * TechRadar: ChatGPT 5.2 branded a step backwards by early users. TechRadar<ref>{{cite web|title=TechRadar|url=https://www.techradar.com/ai-platforms-assistants/openai/chatgpt-5-2-branded-a-step-backwards-by-disappointed-early-users-heres-why|publisher=techradar.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * Fello AI: “Monster on benchmarks—so why do users hate it?” (sentiment synthesis). Fello AI<ref>{{cite web|title=Fello AI|url=https://felloai.com/gpt-5-2-is-a-monster-on-benchmarks-so-why-do-users-hate-it/|publisher=Fello AI|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * Mehul Gupta (Medium): “I tested GPT‑5.2 and it’s just bad.” Medium<ref>{{cite web|title=Medium|url=https://medium.com/data-science-in-your-pocket/i-tested-gpt-5-2-and-its-just-bad-03888d054916|publisher=medium.com|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * Zvi Mowshowitz (Substack): “GPT‑5.2 is frontier only for the frontier.” The Zvi<ref>{{cite web|title=The Zvi|url=https://thezvi.substack.com/p/gpt-52-is-frontier-only-for-the-frontier|publisher=The Zvi|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * Karo Ziemiński (Substack): “What really changed & why ‘it feels worse’ can mislead.” Karozieminski Substack<ref>{{cite web|title=Karozieminski Substack|url=https://karozieminski.substack.com/p/openai-chatgpt-52-vs-51-reliability-what-changed-why-everyone-is-wrong|publisher=Karozieminski Substack|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * Meng Li (Substack, AI Disruption): Hands‑on 5.2 review (pricing, speed, long‑form tasks). Open Substack<ref>{{cite web|title=Open Substack|url=https://open.substack.com/pub/aidisruption/p/gpt-52-tested-price-up-edge-over|publisher=Open Substack|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * Mindset.ai: “Everything you need to know about GPT‑5.2 in 10 minutes” (modes). Mindset AI<ref>{{cite web|title=Mindset AI|url=https://www.mindset.ai/blogs/in-the-loop-ep43-chatgpt-5-2-review|publisher=Mindset AI|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> * Towards AI: “GPT‑5.2 scores 100%. Users say it’s worse.” (benchmarks vs UX). Towards AI<ref>{{cite web|title=Towards AI|url=https://pub.towardsai.net/gpt-5-2-scores-100-users-say-its-worse-here-s-every-feature-and-why-b7368571375c|publisher=Towards AI|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref> ===== (Optional) Want these exported to a CSV with titles, platforms, and dates so you can filter/sort? I can generate it for you in one go. ===== Recent reporting on GPT‑5.2ReutersOpenAI launches GPT-5.2 after 'code red' push to counter Google's Gemini 320 days ago<ref>{{cite web|title=ReutersOpenAI launches GPT-5.2 after 'code red' push to counter Google's Gemini 320 days ago|url=https://www.reuters.com/technology/openai-launches-gpt-52-ai-model-with-improved-capabilities-2025-12-11/|publisher=ReutersOpenAI launches GPT-5.2 after 'code red' push to counter Google's Gemini 320 days ago|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref>WIREDOpenAI Rolls Back ChatGPT's Model Router System for Most Users15 days ago<ref>{{cite web|title=WIREDOpenAI Rolls Back ChatGPT's Model Router System for Most Users15 days ago|url=https://www.wired.com/story/openai-router-relaunch-gpt-5-sam-altman|publisher=WIREDOpenAI Rolls Back ChatGPT's Model Router System for Most Users15 days ago|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref>TechRadarChatGPT 5.2 branded a 'step backwards' by disappointed early users - here's why19 days ago<ref>{{cite web|title=TechRadarChatGPT 5.2 branded a 'step backwards' by disappointed early users - here's why19 days ago|url=https://www.techradar.com/ai-platforms-assistants/openai/chatgpt-5-2-branded-a-step-backwards-by-disappointed-early-users-heres-why|publisher=TechRadarChatGPT 5.2 branded a 'step backwards' by disappointed early users - here's why19 days ago|access-date=2025-12-31}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
