Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69256b37-1cac-8004-bb0d-12fcbb764b89
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 1. Short term (2025β2035): Low odds of self-correction ==== Structural reality * Xi has already: - Removed term limits and reversed collective leadership norms. University of Technology Sydney<ref>{{cite web|title=University of Technology Sydney|url=https://www.uts.edu.au/news/2018/03/xi-jinping-and-end-chinas-term-limits|publisher=University of Technology Sydney|access-date=2025-11-25}}</ref> - Centralized decision-making in his own hands, recentralizing the party-state and shrinking elite pluralism. USCC<ref>{{cite web|title=USCC|url=https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2022-11/Chapter_1--CCP_Decision-Making_and_Xi_Jinpings_Centralization_of_Authority.pdf|publisher=uscc.gov|access-date=2025-11-25}}</ref> - Intensified purges in party and PLA, signaled at the latest plenums and military shake-ups. Wall Street Journal<ref>{{cite web|title=Wall Street Journal|url=https://www.wsj.com/world/china/xi-jinpings-purges-shrink-ranks-of-chinas-communist-elite-0fdd1ca3|publisher=Wall Street Journal|access-date=2025-11-25}}</ref> This is movement away from self-correcting governance: fewer independent centers, fewer veto points, more personalist rule. Perturbation from liberal democracies * Europe and East Asian liberal democracies (Japan, South Korea, Taiwan): - Show high scores on political rights and civil liberties and stable governance. Freedom House<ref>{{cite web|title=Freedom House|url=https://freedomhouse.org/country/japan|publisher=Freedom House|access-date=2025-11-25}}</ref> - Have electorates that strongly reject βgovernment can ignore the law in a crisis,β especially in Japan/Korea/Taiwan. NTU Scholars<ref>{{cite web|title=NTU Scholars|url=https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstreams/b2fa3344-2cfd-45f4-9680-a72ccb4b9a84/download|publisher=NTU Scholars|access-date=2025-11-25}}</ref> From a Bridge360 view, these are external low-autocracy attractors. But: * The CCP actively damps these perturbations via censorship, propaganda, and framing Western and East Asian democracies as chaotic/decadent. Bridge360 short-term estimate * In 2025β2035, autocracy is still on an upward trajectory; internal incentives for self-correction are weak, and Xi is still consolidating. * The demo effect from Europe + East Asia is present but heavily filtered. π Heuristic probability that the Politburo meaningfully self-corrects (reduces autocracy, restores some institutional constraints) by ~2035: β 10β20% Mostly through: * Quiet re-empowerment of technocrats, or * Limited institutionalization under Xi (or in his late years), not full political opening.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)