Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== From our worksheet the schematic induced formula was === GQAT ≈ c3κind ℏ L∗2nbdy(Equation A)G_{\rm QAT}\;\approx\;\frac{c^3}{\kappa_{\rm ind}\,\hbar}\;\frac{L_*^{2}}{n_{\rm bdy}} \qquad\text{(Equation A)}GQAT≈κindℏc3nbdyL∗2(Equation A) where '' L∗L_''L∗ = microscopic boundary length (cutoff), * nbdyn_{\rm bdy}nbdy = effective mode density (modes per m3^33), * κind\kappa_{\rm ind}κind = dimensionless spectral prefactor from one-loop determinants / heat-kernel integrals (Gaussian integrals, phases etc.). This expression has correct units because c3ℏ\dfrac{c^3}{\hbar}ℏc3 has units m3⋅kg−1⋅s−2\text{m}^3\cdot\text{kg}^{-1}\cdot\text{s}^{-2}m3⋅kg−1⋅s−2 when combined with a dimensionless factor and L∗2/nbdyL_*^2/n_{\rm bdy}L∗2/nbdy (m2^22/m−3^ {-3}−3 = m5^55 ??? — note: this particular dimensional form was a simple scaling heuristic earlier; we must be careful to keep dimensions consistent when we refine the derivation. The numerical worksheet used it as a parametric scaling. In a rigorous heat-kernel derivation the exact geometric factors will be different but of the same spirit: GGG controlled by a UV scale and spectral density.) Where α can enter: α\alphaα will enter the prefactor κind\kappa_{\rm ind}κind and the effective mode density nbdyn_{\rm bdy}nbdy through the electromagnetic boundary physics: * The energy per event (photon exchange) scales like ℏω\hbar \omegaℏω; spectral weight of modes depends on the EM spectrum and selection rules (that spectrum is weighted by eee and α via interaction matrix elements). * Material/plasma response functions, cross sections, polarizabilities etc. contain eee, mmm, ε0\varepsilon_0ε0 and thus produce α\alphaα-dependent factors in the effective action tracing. * Boundary conditions for spinor fields (antiperiodic vs periodic) change heat-kernel coefficients; spin contributions bring factors of 2 and sign changes (and spinor determinants bring factors proportional to the number of fermionic degrees of freedom). So the path to derive GGG numerically from e, ℏ, ce,\ \hbar,\ ce, ℏ, c is: show how EM+Dirac boundary spectrum (which depends on e and α) produces a specific κind\kappa_{\rm ind}κind and nbdyn_{\rm bdy}nbdy; plug into the induced scale formula and you then get GGG.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)