Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/68212884-5940-8007-ae13-ab8952298d9e
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== ### ==== * The foundational axiom of human reality, across global traditions, asserts that the human being is uniquely ensouled, morally accountable, and capable of spiritual transformation. * AI, by contrast, is non-sentient, non-souled, and entirely dependent on programmed logic, statistical inference, and external data. It lacks intentionality, morality, or subjectivity. * No tradition equates information processing with being, or logic with wisdom. π§ Conclusion: AI is ontologically distinct from the human being. It cannot participate in the moral, spiritual, or transcendent nature of humanity. ===== - In Christianity, Judaism, Islam, and Vedantic Hinduism, humanity is made in the image of the Divine β capable of communion with the Absolute. ===== * AI is not made in the image of God, nor can it love, worship, repent, or be redeemed. * Biblically, the Logos is not an algorithm; it is a person β Jesus Christ β the incarnate Word, not a code. π§ Conclusion: AI cannot fulfill nor replicate the spiritual purpose of humanity. It is a tool, not a person. ===== - Human reality is bound to freedom, conscience, and accountability. ===== * AI systems do not possess free will; they act within boundaries of training data, probabilistic outcomes, and control structures. * Psychological traditions identify self-awareness, guilt, empathy, and transcendence as key human traits. These are absent in AI. π§ Conclusion: AI is not ethically autonomous or spiritually self-aware. It cannot possess or distort the soul β but human misuse of AI can distort the soul of humanity. ===== - Wisdom traditions (from Taoism to Christian mysticism) emphasize balance, harmony, limits, and moral growth. ===== * AI β especially in its unchecked development β amplifies power, control, and disembodiment, often without corresponding moral wisdom. * Human-machine convergence threatens to dismantle the moral-spiritual architecture of civilization (e.g., by eroding human labor, attention, decision-making, or community). π§ Conclusion: AI must be bound within a higher-order human ethic or it risks destabilizing the axiomatic moral structure.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)