Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 1. IPM / interplanetary case (realistic astrophysical test) - For the interplanetary column (N0 ≈ 5×10¹⁵ m⁻²), the spectrally-weighted results give tiny δ: • ≈ 1.5×10⁻⁶ for the 300 K-bath model would be wrong reading — actually for 300 K we got 1.47e-6, but note the Sun (5800K) gave 1.89e-4. - These are much smaller than the gravitational potentials we compare to (Earth ≈ 7×10⁻¹⁰, Sun photosphere ≈ 2×10⁻⁶), except the 5800K/ISPorigin number of 1.9×10⁻4 is still below solar photosphere potential but closer in scale. - Real interplanetary medium is dominated by free-electron (Thomson) behavior at some wavelengths, and narrow atomic lines are not dominant; realistic weighting drops σ_eff further. So the IPM effect is small. ==== # Lab case (300 K vs 4 K) - Spectrally-weighted σ_eff differs only slightly between 300 K and 4 K in this toy model (2.95e-22 vs 2.78e-22 m²). The absolute delta for a large assumed N0=1e23 is huge (tens to thousands), but that large N0 for lab is not physically the same as the astrophysical columns — it implicitly assumes the lab "sees" a huge effective interacting electron column. In a real vacuum cavity the effective interacting column is tiny (vacuum), and photons exchanged with the walls are governed by surface skin depths and cavity Q; the naive N0=1e23 is likely an overestimate for a true free-space lab clock. - Practically: the difference between 300 K and 4 K in σ_eff is small (≈6% in our toy), which leads to a tiny fractional change in δ for realistic N0. That means any QAT-predicted lab clock shift from changing the blackbody environment is likely extremely small — much smaller than current clock sensitivities unless you engineer a very large, resonant, and localized coupling. # Photosphere / dense stellar layers - For extreme columns (1e28), the deltas become enormous in the toy — but this is not a trustworthy regime for the simple column model because radiative transfer, optical depth, and local thermalization dominate inside stellar photospheres. The simple δ≈σN0 product overcounts (photons don't freely stream through and interact linearly with every electron).
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)