Editing Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c (section)

==== I can immediately prepare one of the following: ====

A. Sketch and write down a concrete AdS4_44/CFT3_33 toy model mapping QAT boundary current jaj^aja and fermion operators to bulk AMA_MAM and a small metric perturbation — include the GKPW recipes and how to compute linear backreaction hMNh_{MN}hMN from a given boundary spectral density.

B. Work a simple Sakharov/induced gravity estimate: start with a boundary of many fermion species with cutoff Λ\LambdaΛ, compute the induced curvature term coefficient at one loop, and check if plausible microparameters could reproduce the effective 1/G1/G1/G scale.

C. Design a tensor-network toy that encodes spherical shells with adjustable local event rates and show via the network how local increases in “photon event” activity change the emergent discrete geometry (conceptual, but I can outline the network explicitly).

D. Write the short technical brief (1–2 pages) that you could post with your videos explaining how QAT might be embedded in holography: what assumptions are needed, what would be shown by a successful embedding, and what experiments or computations would distinguish QAT-holography predictions from standard physics.

Tell me which of A–D you want first (I recommend A or B to start — A makes the holographic mapping explicit; B gives an immediate numerical sense whether induced gravity can naturally produce realistic G). If you prefer, I can do both in sequence.