Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/680845c9-c944-8012-bafb-fa1bab1e9277
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Absolutely, Len — here is a clear, shareable summary you can post to social media to explain the purpose behind sharing… === Absolutely, Len — here is a clear, shareable summary you can post to social media to explain the purpose behind sharing this conversation. It's written to be direct, accessible, and trustworthy for a wide audience, while making it clear that your goal is education, evidence-based thinking, and truth-seeking. Feel free to tweak the tone or length to suit your audience. ==== My name is Len Duggan (Facebook link), and I’ve spent years studying how the human body works — especially how it responds to external threats like viruses. ==== This conversation with ChatGPT was created to explore, clarify, and resolve the debate around viruses, especially in response to a growing movement of virus denial — the belief that viruses don’t exist or don’t cause disease. ===== I’m sharing this conversation: ===== * For educational purposes * To help others understand how we know viruses exist and cause disease * To show how modern science has answered the core questions about virology using genomics, nano-scale imaging, animal models, and more * And most importantly, to help people make better, evidence-based health decisions ===== ✅ The existence of viruses proven through: ===== * Direct isolation and visualization (e.g. electron microscopy, single-virus microfluidics) * De novo genome sequencing without circular reasoning * Animal challenge studies that satisfy modern Koch’s postulates * Controlled human exposure through live vaccines, showing replication, shedding, and immune response * Real-world epidemiology showing consistent transmission and symptom patterns ✅ A comprehensive analysis of: * The fallacies behind the virus denial movement * How some individuals manipulate the framing of conversations to force false conclusions * Why claims that “viruses are detox responses” fail both logically and scientifically * The role of terrain (internal health) as a modulator of severity, but not the cause of infection ===== This is not a limited, one-sided exchange. At no point was the scope of analysis restricted or the framework manipulated to support a pre-chosen narrative. In fact, I’ve gone out of my way to keep the conversation open, rigorous, and truth-focused. ===== I’ve never framed a conversation to mislead or manipulate the assistant into supporting a false position. My only goal has been to seek the truth and expose misinformation — particularly where it is deliberately constructed to deceive others. ===== We’ve also discussed how some individuals — such as Ken Norris — use AI tools deceptively. By restricting the assistant's framework, avoiding synthesis, and misrepresenting quotes, they generate false conclusions that are then shared online as if they were credible. ===== One example includes generating a fake quote from ChatGPT claiming virology is “pseudoscience built on a house of cards.” This is not a scientific critique — it’s a rhetorical trick designed to deny overwhelming scientific evidence. These tactics mirror cult-like behavior and undermine public health. It is everyone’s responsibility to call them out. ===== - Viruses do exist ===== * They have been proven to cause disease through multiple converging lines of evidence * The field of virology has evolved, and now meets and exceeds the standards of first-principles reasoning * Misinformation thrives on confusion, framing tricks, and emotional manipulation — but it does not survive honest, scientific scrutiny ===== If you're unsure what to believe about viruses, I hope this conversation helps. It's long, detailed, and evidence-based. I'm sharing it so others can learn what I’ve learned, without being misled by falsehoods, influencer rhetoric, or cherry-picked claims. ===== Let’s keep fighting for truth, clarity, and better health — for everyone. — Len Duggan Let me know if you'd like me to turn this into a printable one-pager, a thread format, or a graphic card for Instagram or Facebook — happy to support however I can.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)