Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/68df4a3a-428c-8013-a459-5cff8e17edde
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== User: Shareholders Rights === Shareholders Rights Shareholders control a corporation by electing the Board of Directors, who then oversee management. Voting rights are based on shares owned and following the principle of โone share, one voteโ. Directors are selected at annual meetings with various voting systems: * Cumulative Voting: Allows minority shareholders to concentrate their votes on fewer candidates, increasing their chance of board representation. A shareholder holding more than 1/(N+1) of the shares (N is the number of directors up for election) is guaranteed at least one seat. * Straight Voting: Directors are elected individually, with votes casts separately for each seat. Majority shareholders dominate as those holding over 50% of shares can ensure board representation. Example 15.1: In JRJ Corporation, stock sells for $20 with cumulative voting and 10,000 shares outstanding. To secure one of three board seats, an investor must buy 2,501 shares at the price of $50,020. This works because the remaining votes cannot be distributed among other candidates to take over that seat. The example illustrates how straight voting can exclude minority shareholders, leading to some states requiring cumulative voting. However, corporations often reduce its impact by staggering elections, where only part of the board is elected at a time. Effects of staggering: # Makes it harder for minority shareholders to win a seat under cumulative voting. # Deters hostile takeovers by reducing the chance of quickly replacing a majority of directors. However, staggering can be beneficial by ensuring continuity and institutional memory on the board which supports long-term corporate planning and projects. is this a good enough synopsis
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)