Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: I can run the calculation now — I just need to confirm one practical point before I start. === I can run the calculation now — I just need to confirm one practical point before I start. I do not have live web access from this session to pull high-precision refractive-index tables (Hale & Querry / refractiveindex.info). I can proceed immediately using a standard analytic dispersion model (a Cauchy / simple Sellmeier approximation for liquid water) so we get a first, illustrative result showing the effect size and trends. Later we can replace the dispersion with the high-precision tabulated n(λ) and re-run to get the final, publication-quality numbers. Please confirm which of these two options you prefer: A) Run now with an approximate analytic dispersion model for water (fast; gives robust qualitative results and likely correct order-of-magnitude for Δθ). B) Wait while I fetch high-precision n(λ) tables and then run (more accurate; requires web data). If you choose A (quick run), please confirm the spectra you want tested. I suggest the default set below unless you want changes: • Continuous (Planck) spectra at T = 3000 K and T = 5800 K (Sun). • Narrow atomic emission lines: Hα (656.28 nm), Hβ (486.13 nm), Na D doublet (589.0 & 589.6 nm). (Lines modelled as narrow Gaussians with small σ, or delta functions.) • A sample plasma emission set: [O III] 500.7 nm and an example He II line (468.6 nm) — or I can pick a plasma set you prefer. • Mixtures: Planck + single strong line (vary amplitude) to see how strong a line must be to shift the mean by ~0.47°. I will: # compute the rainbow-style scattering angle θ(λ) for a spherical water droplet using the standard primary-rainbow ray-deviation stationary point method, across 350–900 nm; # compute the spectrum-weighted mean angle θˉ\bar\thetaθˉ for each S(λ) and the difference Δθ = θˉ−θG\bar\theta - \theta_Gθˉ−θG (θ_G = golden angle in degrees); # show plots of θ(λ), S(λ) choices, and report Δθ numeric results and a short interpretation. Which option do you want — A (approximate, run now) or B (wait for high-precision data)? And do the suggested spectral lines and temperatures look good, or would you like to change/add any lines?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)