Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/692e1a61-9f08-800b-89a7-b2d4c506df31
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 3. Why would a company choose NoSQL? ==== Common business/technical motivations: ===== 1) Massive scale and high availability needs ===== * Global consumer apps, social networks, IoT platforms, ad-tech, large e-commerce β all often face: - Billions of records - Very spiky traffic - Multi-region deployments * NoSQL can provide simpler scaling and replication patterns, and built-in sharding. ===== 2) Rapidly evolving products / data models ===== * Startups iterating quickly on product features * Companies integrating many third-party data sources with inconsistent schemas * APIs that frequently add/remove fields NoSQLβs flexible schema reduces migration pain and allows quicker iteration. ===== 3) Specific data models that fit better than relational ===== * Document-oriented domains: content management, user profiles, application settings * Time series and event data: logs, metrics, sensor data (often wide-column or time-series DBs) * Relationship-heavy domains: social graphs, recommendation systems, fraud detection (graph DBs) Using a data model aligned with the use case can simplify code and improve performance. ===== 4) Microservices and polyglot persistence ===== Companies increasingly use polyglot persistence: * Different services use the storage technology best suited to their needs * Example: - Core billing and financial transactions: relational DB for ACID guarantees - Session storage, cache, and rate-limiting: key-value store (Redis) - Product catalog and user profiles: document store - Analytics backend: columnar or data warehouse NoSQL is often the right choice for some subset of those services. ===== 5) Cost and operational considerations (sometimes) ===== Managed NoSQL services (e.g., DynamoDB, Firestore, Cosmos DB, MongoDB Atlas, etc.) can: * Offload much of the operational burden (backups, replication, scaling) * Offer pay-as-you-go pricing that maps to request volume / storage * Reduce the need for specialized DBA work in some contexts This is not universally cheaper, but for certain traffic patterns and staffing constraints, it can be very attractive.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)