Editing Openai/680a25f8-9f18-8004-a42d-cd36374ba000 (section)

=== Here’s a text-friendly reply you could use to close this: ===

Final Response:

Thanks Stephen —
* The temperature rise is not assumed; it’s derived from full radiative balance.
* Ambient supersaturation is explicitly included; realistic flight-level RHi values are far below the ~373% required to suppress sublimation at elevated particle temperatures.
* Sublimation timescales are properly modeled via mass-transfer limited rates; environmental water vapor replenishment is negligible on particle sublimation timescales (~1 second).

My analysis remains physically rigorous and internally consistent.

At this point, unless there’s a specific numerical error identified (rather than general claims), there’s nothing further to correct.

Thanks again for the discussion.

Would you also like a "super sharp, confident" version (if you want to close it a little harder without being rude)?
It would add just a touch more authority if you want to be absolutely final. 🚀