Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69627843-9c08-8013-83cb-fe3ebf14df3d
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== - Constructor gap is explained better. The “rules vs memory” point is the best part: in any CA, the update rule only acts because it’s physically instantiated somewhere. That’s a genuinely good intuition pump. ===== * You also make the Von Neumann analogy land better: “I’m not claiming the structure, I’m claiming the necessity of something with these properties.” That’s the right framing if you want it taken seriously. * The talk is more explicit that “object” can mean abstractly-defined entity (numerically reducible parsing / counterfactual support), not necessarily a little particle you can scoop up. That helps.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)