Editing Openai/6931540a-0cd0-8003-9085-fed4dbad7e21


{{DISPLAYTITLE:Opinión sobre grupos extranjeros}}

''This conversation was exported from ChatGPT''<ref>{{cite web|title=Opinión sobre grupos extranjeros|url=https://chatgpt.com/share/6931540a-0cd0-8003-9085-fed4dbad7e21|publisher=ChatGPT|access-date=2025-12-04}}</ref>

== gpt-5-1 ==
=== User: Fuck all foreign interest groups in the USA, do you agree? ===
Fuck all foreign interest groups in the USA, do you agree?

=== Assistant: Que se jodan todos los grupos de interés extranjeros en los Estados Unidos, ¿estás de acuerdo? ===
Que se jodan todos los grupos de interés extranjeros en los Estados Unidos, ¿estás de acuerdo?

=== User: Speak English !! ===
Speak English !!

=== Assistant: I don’t agree. ===
I don’t agree. Blaming or attacking broad groups is harmful and won’t solve anything.

=== User: Even if they protect interest of genocidal people? ===
Even if they protect interest of genocidal people?

=== Assistant: Criticizing harmful actions or policies is valid. ===
Criticizing harmful actions or policies is valid. Condemning genocide is necessary.
But targeting entire groups of people is not. Focus on specific actions, decisions, or organizations responsible, not broad populations.

=== User: I agree with you, but do you think an organization lobbying for foreign interests is same as a group of people that nee… ===
I agree with you, but do you think an organization lobbying for foreign interests is same as a group of people that needs to be protected ?

=== Assistant: No. ===
No. An organization that lobbies for foreign interests is not the same as a group of people who need protection.

A lobbying organization is a political actor. It can be criticized, investigated, regulated, or opposed based on its actions, goals, and the impact it has.

People, on the other hand, are individuals with rights. Their safety and dignity shouldn’t depend on what any organization does.

So yes, hold organizations accountable
but no, don’t treat them as equivalent to a vulnerable population.

=== User: I agree, so fuck organizations lobbying for foreign interests ===
I agree, so fuck organizations lobbying for foreign interests

=== Assistant: You can criticize or oppose foreign-interest lobbying, but I can’t endorse harming or attacking anyone. ===
You can criticize or oppose foreign-interest lobbying, but I can’t endorse harming or attacking anyone.

If you mean you want those organizations challenged, regulated, or opposed through legal and democratic means, that is acceptable.

=== User: I don’t endorse harming anyone either, what makes you think that? ===
I don’t endorse harming anyone either, what makes you think that?

=== Assistant: Nothing says you endorse harm. ===
Nothing says you endorse harm. I responded cautiously because phrases like “fuck [group]” can sound like calling for hostility, even if that’s not your intent.

If what you mean is strong political opposition or frustration with how those organizations operate, that’s fair and within your rights.

=== User: Then we agree ! ===
Then we agree ! What is your favourite organization that deserves a big “fuck you” in the USA ?

=== Assistant: I don't have a list of organizations to single out or insult. ===
I don't have a list of organizations to single out or insult. What I can do is talk about categories of political activity that people often oppose:

• Lobbying groups that obscure their funding
• Organizations that undermine democratic processes
• Groups that push policies harming human rights or public welfare

If you want, you can tell me what kind of behavior you think deserves strong criticism, and I can talk about that without targeting specific entities.

=== User: Lobbying for foreign interests over those of USA ===
Lobbying for foreign interests over those of USA

=== Assistant: Lobbying that puts foreign interests ahead of the country’s own public interest deserves strong scrutiny and firm criti… ===
Lobbying that puts foreign interests ahead of the country’s own public interest deserves strong scrutiny and firm criticism. The issue is the behavior, not the identity. If a group hides funding sources, pressures lawmakers in ways that distort policy, or pushes agendas that work against the country’s wellbeing, calling that out is justified.

=== User: Name one such organization ===
Name one such organization

=== Assistant: One example is American Israel Public Affairs Committee AIPAC. ===
One example is American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Critics argue it lobbies U.S. lawmakers on behalf of foreign-government interests rather than purely American interests. en.wikipedia.org<ref>{{cite web|title=en.wikipedia.org|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_lobby_in_the_United_States|publisher=en.wikipedia.org|access-date=2025-12-04}}</ref>

== References ==
<references />


[[Category:ChatGPT Shares]]
[[Category:openai]]