Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/692c6597-e83c-8006-aad0-c337c4e8bbff
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Grammar correction comparison}} ''This conversation was exported from ChatGPT''<ref>{{cite web|title=Grammar correction comparison|url=https://chatgpt.com/share/692c6597-e83c-8006-aad0-c337c4e8bbff|publisher=ChatGPT|access-date=2025-11-30}}</ref> == gpt-5-1-thinking == === User: Correct grammar === Correct grammar When ChatGPT came out three years ago, it was a fantastic model. A great success of OpenAI’s research team fueled by monetary investments in annotations and compute. Very quickly the linguistic fluency was confused with intelligence and pattern generalisation for ability to create new ideas. A lot of lies and misinformation started circulating regarding the abilities of the models. A lot of investments were flown into what could never work and more was given on the promise of what can never be achieved. Now many find themselves in a position of an unlucky poker player - they bet too much to call it but the flush royal is not coming. The next three years will be different - defunding, mistrust but all the noise will go away. That might actually be the time to gain competitive advantage, modernise infrastructure, build up IT teams with AI assisted coding and focus on individual productivity enhanced by existing tools. === Assistant: When ChatGPT arrived three years ago, it was a fantastic model—an outstanding success by OpenAI’s research team, powere… === When ChatGPT arrived three years ago, it was a fantastic model—an outstanding success by OpenAI’s research team, powered by heavy investment in annotation and compute. Very quickly, linguistic fluency was mistaken for intelligence, and pattern generalisation for the ability to create new ideas. Lies and misinformation spread about the models’ capabilities. Massive investments flowed into things that could never work, with even more committed on the promise of what can never be achieved. Now many find themselves like unlucky poker players: they have bet too much to fold, but the royal flush is not coming. The next three years will be different: defunding and mistrust will rise, but the noise will fade. That may be the time to gain a competitive advantage, modernise infrastructure, strengthen IT teams with AI-assisted coding, and focus on individual productivity using existing tools. == References == <references /> [[Category:ChatGPT Shares]] [[Category:openai]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Templates used on this page:
Template:Cite web
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/COinS
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/Date validation
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/Utilities
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/Whitelist
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css
(
edit
)